Link landscape
Backlink and coverage review with relevant opportunities
Your reputation should not depend on a spreadsheet of purchased links. I assess the sources that matter in your market, identify credible reasons for other sites to reference your business, and shape outreach around something worth sharing.
An illustration of the approach, not a live audit.
For businesses with a credible offer and useful expertise whose external presence does not yet reflect it. Best suited to teams willing to contribute original insight, resources, or expert input—not simply purchase a monthly link count.
Backlink and coverage review with relevant opportunities
Qualified prospect shortlist and outreach rationale
Approved outreach angles and asset requirements
Placement and activity record with quality observations and next actions
Choose an area to explore the work and what you receive.
Connect useful expertise with relevant publishers and resources your audience already values.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataReview the existing backlink landscape and relevant competitor coverage. Separate useful editorial references, lost opportunities, and issues that warrant further investigation without treating every low tool score as a threat.
Identify publications, industry resources, partners, and journalists that reach the intended audience. Qualify prospects by relevance, editorial context, and the reason your business belongs in the conversation.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataIdentify publications, industry resources, partners, and journalists that reach the intended audience. Qualify prospects by relevance, editorial context, and the reason your business belongs in the conversation.
Develop outreach angles around actual expertise, original resources, or helpful contributions. Agree who provides subject-matter input and who approves public claims before contact begins.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataDevelop outreach angles around actual expertise, original resources, or helpful contributions. Agree who provides subject-matter input and who approves public claims before contact begins.
Record outreach activity and assess earned mentions by context, destination, relevance, and referral value. Review what editors respond to and refine the next round.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataRecord outreach activity and assess earned mentions by context, destination, relevance, and referral value. Review what editors respond to and refine the next round.
We agree the scope and responsibilities first, then move from investigation to implementation and review.
Understand your business, your audience, and the problem you want to solve.
Agree what matters most and the work that fits your resources.
Deliver the agreed recommendations and coordinate the necessary changes.
Check the work, interpret the evidence, and decide the next useful action.
An apparently attractive placement can be a poor fit if it has no relevant audience or credible editorial reason. I would rather explain why an opportunity should be rejected than make a monthly report look busy.
Review my professional experienceOutreach is based on domain scores with little connection to the company’s expertise.
Build a relevant editorial shortlist and an evidence-backed contribution that gives the publisher a reason to respond.
Evaluate the coverage and referral context instead of reporting link volume alone.
An illustrative comparison of the approach. These examples describe improvements to the work, not promised performance results.
Agree research depth, asset requirements, outreach responsibilities, approvals, and reporting. Editorial acceptance and publication dates are outside my control. Paid sponsorships, if separately agreed, must be transparent and appropriately qualified.
Review the relevance and context of earned coverage, useful referring sources, referral engagement, and the performance of supported pages. Domain metrics are comparative tool signals; they do not establish business value or guarantee rankings.
My 7+ years in SEO and digital marketing inform how I investigate, prioritise, and communicate the work. You work directly with the person responsible for the recommendations.
Start with the business objective and the economics behind it. The proposal sets out priority work, dependencies, fees, and how we will assess progress. Where evidence is incomplete, assumptions remain visible.
Agree the backlog, implementation owner, review cadence, and approval process. Recommendations include the reasoning and practical handoffs your writers, developers, or account team need.
Use my CV and experience summaries to assess role fit, responsibility, and how I approach the work. My SEO leadership background includes Kazix and Yoddha Lab; the portfolio distinguishes CV-based experience from verified client case studies.
View background & CVA diagnostic project, implementation sprint, or ongoing partnership should each have a written scope, named owners, a review schedule, and a clear approach to additional work. Fees depend on complexity, delivery responsibility, and the agreed scope.
The toolset depends on your site, access, and the agreed scope.
The work is scoped around relevant opportunities and quality. A link count alone does not explain whether those placements are useful or credible.
A clear story, useful expertise, or an asset that gives another site a reason to mention you. I help identify the strongest angle.
You work directly with Barshad. We agree any developer, writer, or internal-team responsibilities as part of the scope.
After reviewing your requirements, we agree the priority work, deliverables, dependencies, timeline, and fees before starting.
No. Rankings, demand, competition, platform changes, and implementation affect results. I commit to clear work, transparent priorities, and evidence-led review.
Yes. Share your existing workflow and available resources so we can agree ownership, handoffs, and the support your team needs.
A link-profile review, relevant outreach opportunities and agreed quality criteria.
Review relevance, referral activity and useful business exposure. Third-party authority scores are diagnostic indicators.
Agree the business objective, baseline, access, implementation owner and review period. Prioritise by likely impact, effort, dependencies and business relevance.
Share your website and the challenge you want to solve. Let’s start with a useful conversation.