Content brief
Search and audience brief with page purpose and outline
Good content makes your expertise useful to someone else. I develop search-informed briefs and copy that explain your offer, answer real objections, and bring forward the evidence a customer needs before taking the next step.
An illustration of the approach, not a live audit.
For teams with a clear offer and access to subject-matter expertise, but limited time to turn it into useful service pages, category content, or articles. Especially relevant when existing copy sounds interchangeable with competitors.
Search and audience brief with page purpose and outline
Agreed drafts with evidence requests and editorial notes
On-page recommendations and contextual internal-link suggestions
Publication checklist and content maintenance priorities
Choose an area to explore the work and what you receive.
Connect search needs, first-hand expertise, and clear structure before the first draft is written.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataDefine the reader, search intent, page role, and next action before drafting. Review existing coverage and identify what the page must explain to earn its place.
Gather product knowledge, process details, examples, and customer questions from your team. Identify claims requiring evidence or specialist approval rather than filling gaps with plausible language.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataGather product knowledge, process details, examples, and customer questions from your team. Identify claims requiring evidence or specialist approval rather than filling gaps with plausible language.
Write or commission the agreed format with clear structure, specific explanations, and a recognisable brand voice. Include decision criteria, limitations, and proof where the business can substantiate them.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataWrite or commission the agreed format with clear structure, specific explanations, and a recognisable brand voice. Include decision criteria, limitations, and proof where the business can substantiate them.
Review factual accuracy, readability, internal links, and on-page implementation. Agree who maintains changing information and how performance will inform future updates.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataReview factual accuracy, readability, internal links, and on-page implementation. Agree who maintains changing information and how performance will inform future updates.
We agree the scope and responsibilities first, then move from investigation to implementation and review.
Understand your business, your audience, and the problem you want to solve.
Agree what matters most and the work that fits your resources.
Deliver the agreed recommendations and coordinate the necessary changes.
Check the work, interpret the evidence, and decide the next useful action.
When a draft could belong to any competitor, the missing ingredient is usually business knowledge. I ask for the process, trade-offs, examples, and evidence that make the page specific before polishing the language.
Review my professional experienceA service page lists broad benefits but gives no explanation of delivery or fit.
Interview the service owner and build the copy around scope, decision criteria, actual process, and substantiated proof.
Review whether visitors reach relevant next steps and whether sales receives better-informed enquiries.
An illustrative comparison of the approach. These examples describe improvements to the work, not promised performance results.
Specify page formats, research depth, expert access, copy ownership, approval rounds, and publishing responsibilities. Specialist review, translation, imagery, and original research are agreed separately when needed.
Review relevant query coverage, organic landing-page engagement, and the next actions appropriate to the page’s role. A support article and a service page have different jobs; their success should not be reduced to one traffic target.
My 7+ years in SEO and digital marketing inform how I investigate, prioritise, and communicate the work. You work directly with the person responsible for the recommendations.
Start with the business objective and the economics behind it. The proposal sets out priority work, dependencies, fees, and how we will assess progress. Where evidence is incomplete, assumptions remain visible.
Agree the backlog, implementation owner, review cadence, and approval process. Recommendations include the reasoning and practical handoffs your writers, developers, or account team need.
Use my CV and experience summaries to assess role fit, responsibility, and how I approach the work. My SEO leadership background includes Kazix and Yoddha Lab; the portfolio distinguishes CV-based experience from verified client case studies.
View background & CVA diagnostic project, implementation sprint, or ongoing partnership should each have a written scope, named owners, a review schedule, and a clear approach to additional work. Fees depend on complexity, delivery responsibility, and the agreed scope.
The toolset depends on your site, access, and the agreed scope.
AI can support research organisation and drafting tasks. Final content still needs human judgement, factual checking, and relevant business expertise.
Yes. I start with your existing materials, intended audience, and examples of the tone you want, then agree the direction before producing a larger batch.
You work directly with Barshad. We agree any developer, writer, or internal-team responsibilities as part of the scope.
After reviewing your requirements, we agree the priority work, deliverables, dependencies, timeline, and fees before starting.
No. Rankings, demand, competition, platform changes, and implementation affect results. I commit to clear work, transparent priorities, and evidence-led review.
Yes. Share your existing workflow and available resources so we can agree ownership, handoffs, and the support your team needs.
A brief, source requirements, page structure, editorial review steps and internal-link recommendations.
Assess query relevance, content usefulness and the next action. Subject experts review specialised claims.
Agree the business objective, baseline, access, implementation owner and review period. Prioritise by likely impact, effort, dependencies and business relevance.
Share your website and the challenge you want to solve. Let’s start with a useful conversation.