Search intent
Priority URL map with intent, business role, current issue, recommended action, and owner
Your most important pages should make it clear who you help, why your offer is relevant, and what to do next. I connect search intent, content structure, internal linking, and conversion paths so your service and product pages have a defined commercial job.
An illustration of the approach, not a live audit.
For businesses with established pages, search impressions, and an offer that already sells—but inconsistent organic enquiries. Especially useful when rankings stall, the wrong page appears for a query, or several pages compete for the same customer need.
Priority URL map with intent, business role, current issue, recommended action, and owner
Page briefs or agreed copy edits covering titles, headings, proof, objections, and calls to action
Internal-link recommendations with source URLs, destinations, and contextual placement
Implementation checklist and a review of affected pages, queries, and relevant conversions
Choose an area to explore the work and what you receive.
Practical accounting support, clear advice, and a straightforward way to discuss your business.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataReview query-to-page performance and the current search results to separate intent mismatch, content gaps, and competing URLs. Decide whether each priority page should be improved, differentiated, or consolidated.
Rewrite or brief titles, headings, introductions, and decision-making content around a defined audience. Bring forward relevant proof, eligibility, service scope, pricing context where appropriate, and objections that delay an enquiry.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataRewrite or brief titles, headings, introductions, and decision-making content around a defined audience. Bring forward relevant proof, eligibility, service scope, pricing context where appropriate, and objections that delay an enquiry.
Map contextual internal links from supporting articles and relevant commercial pages. Review anchor wording and the visitor journey so important pages are discoverable and the next action fits the visitor’s stage.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataMap contextual internal links from supporting articles and relevant commercial pages. Review anchor wording and the visitor journey so important pages are discoverable and the next action fits the visitor’s stage.
Record the agreed edits, check the live implementation, and compare the affected query and page groups against the baseline. Separate observed changes from seasonality, demand shifts, and other site work.
Concept illustration · no client performance dataRecord the agreed edits, check the live implementation, and compare the affected query and page groups against the baseline. Separate observed changes from seasonality, demand shifts, and other site work.
We agree the scope and responsibilities first, then move from investigation to implementation and review.
Understand your business, your audience, and the problem you want to solve.
Agree what matters most and the work that fits your resources.
Deliver the agreed recommendations and coordinate the necessary changes.
Check the work, interpret the evidence, and decide the next useful action.
A page with weak traffic does not automatically need more words. I first establish whether it answers the wrong intent, lacks a persuasive offer, competes with another URL, or cannot be properly discovered. That decision determines whether the budget goes into copy, consolidation, links, or technical work.
Review my professional experienceA service page receives impressions for informational questions but few relevant enquiries.
Separate educational questions from the buying decision; improve the commercial page and map supporting information to appropriate destinations.
Check the query mix and qualified actions for the affected pages after implementation.
An illustrative comparison of the approach. These examples describe improvements to the work, not promised performance results.
Agree the URL count, page types, markets, copy depth, approval rounds, and implementation owner. A template change affecting hundreds of pages is a different engagement from editing ten service pages. Full design rebuilds and development are separately scoped.
Review non-brand query relevance, page-level impressions and clicks, organic landing-page engagement, and qualified enquiries where tracking allows. We define the page cohort and baseline first; a higher click-through rate alone is not evidence of more revenue.
My 7+ years in SEO and digital marketing inform how I investigate, prioritise, and communicate the work. You work directly with the person responsible for the recommendations.
Start with the business objective and the economics behind it. The proposal sets out priority work, dependencies, fees, and how we will assess progress. Where evidence is incomplete, assumptions remain visible.
Agree the backlog, implementation owner, review cadence, and approval process. Recommendations include the reasoning and practical handoffs your writers, developers, or account team need.
Use my CV and experience summaries to assess role fit, responsibility, and how I approach the work. My SEO leadership background includes Kazix and Yoddha Lab; the portfolio distinguishes CV-based experience from verified client case studies.
View background & CVA diagnostic project, implementation sprint, or ongoing partnership should each have a written scope, named owners, a review schedule, and a clear approach to additional work. Fees depend on complexity, delivery responsibility, and the agreed scope.
The toolset depends on your site, access, and the agreed scope.
Either can be scoped. The proposal specifies which pages receive a brief, targeted edits, or a full rewrite, who supplies business evidence, and how many approval rounds are included.
No. The depth depends on the decision the reader needs to make. I use query evidence and page purpose to guide coverage, not a fixed density target or word-count formula.
You work directly with Barshad. We agree any developer, writer, or internal-team responsibilities as part of the scope.
After reviewing your requirements, we agree the priority work, deliverables, dependencies, timeline, and fees before starting.
No. Rankings, demand, competition, platform changes, and implementation affect results. I commit to clear work, transparent priorities, and evidence-led review.
Yes. Share your existing workflow and available resources so we can agree ownership, handoffs, and the support your team needs.
A page-to-query map, prioritised page edits and an internal-link plan.
Review query mix, landing-page engagement and relevant enquiries; record content and tracking changes.
Agree the business objective, baseline, access, implementation owner and review period. Prioritise by likely impact, effort, dependencies and business relevance.
Share your website and the challenge you want to solve. Let’s start with a useful conversation.